‘Don’t blame the actress’: Janhvi Kapoor finds support from Ashika Ranganath amid row over her objectification in Peddi

Don’t Blame the Actress: Janhvi Kapoor’s Peddi Defense Gains Ashika Ranganath Support

Don t blame the actress – The recent debate over the portrayal of Janhvi Kapoor in the sports action film Peddi has seen a shift in public sentiment, with actor Ashika Ranganath offering her endorsement to the actress. While critics have questioned the film’s emphasis on her physicality and objectification, Ranganath has urged viewers to consider the broader systemic issues within the industry. Her Instagram post, which highlights the role of male leads and the perpetuation of gender stereotypes in commercial cinema, resonates with many who feel the narrative should not solely target the performer.

Context of the Controversy and Its Impact

Peddi, directed by Buchi Babu Sana and starring Ram Charan, Janhvi Kapoor, Shiva Rajkumar, and Boman Irani, has sparked a conversation about how female characters are often crafted to complement male protagonists. A particular scene—where the character Peddi kisses Janhvi’s Achiyyamma during a power outage—has drawn attention for its portrayal of gender dynamics. Critics argue that the scene undermines the character’s agency, while supporters believe it adds depth to the romance subplot and reflects real-world interactions.

The controversy has amplified discussions about the balance between artistic expression and gender representation. Janhvi Kapoor, known for her strong on-screen presence, has faced scrutiny for being portrayed as a symbol of allure rather than a fully developed individual. However, her growing support from fellow actors like Ashika Ranganath signals a potential change in how audiences perceive her role and the expectations placed on female stars in commercial films.

Director’s Reflection and Commitment to Improvement

In response to the backlash, director Buchi Babu Sana has acknowledged the need for refinement in the film’s depiction of female characters. He emphasized that the goal of cinema should be to entertain and inspire without reducing actors to mere visual elements. “We have heard the feedback and are committed to making necessary changes to ensure the film aligns with modern values,” he stated, adding that the team is actively reviewing scenes to address concerns about objectification.

“Don’t blame the actress. The responsibility lies with the creators who prioritize aesthetics over narrative depth. Our intent was to craft a compelling story, but we recognize the importance of portraying characters with respect and authenticity,” Sana explained in a follow-up statement. The director’s willingness to adapt has been praised by some as a step toward greater gender inclusivity in South Indian cinema.

Industry Reactions and Broader Implications

While the debate remains active, industry figures have offered varied perspectives. Some argue that the film’s focus on Janhvi Kapoor’s character reflects the popularity of strong female leads in action genres, where physicality often plays a key role. Others, however, see it as part of a larger pattern where actresses are expected to conform to specific archetypes. This discussion has prompted comparisons with past films and the ongoing movement for more nuanced storytelling in South Asian cinema.

Janhvi Kapoor’s advocacy for her character has also sparked conversations about the role of actresses in shaping their narratives. Her ability to maintain a positive stance amid criticism highlights the importance of agency in the face of industry expectations. As the conversation continues, it remains to be seen how this influence will shape future portrayals of women in commercial films and whether it signals a broader cultural shift toward equality in storytelling.

Challenges and Opportunities in Gender Representation

The Peddi controversy underscores the challenges faced by female actors in balancing their roles with societal expectations. While the film’s success at the box office demonstrates its appeal, the debate reveals a gap between audience engagement and critical evaluation. Ashika Ranganath’s support adds credibility to the argument that female characters should be judged by their depth, not just their visual impact. This perspective could inspire filmmakers to rethink how they integrate women into their narratives, ensuring they are not reduced to props for male-driven plots.

“Don’t blame the actress for being a part of the system. She’s a product of the opportunities available, but she’s also challenging the norms by taking a stand,” Ranganath said in her post. Her words resonate with a growing number of voices in the industry who are pushing for more inclusive and respectful portrayals of women in film. As the discussion evolves, it may pave the way for future projects that prioritize character development over objectification.

About the Author

Santanu Das, a Senior Content Producer at Hindustan Times, has been a dedicated film writer for over five years, covering topics ranging from cinema to pop culture and film festivals. His work often highlights the intersection of art and social issues, with a particular focus on South Asian independent films. Santanu’s coverage of events like Sundance and CPH: Docx has earned him recognition in the media landscape.

A graduate of Banaras Hindu University, Santanu completed his postgraduate studies in English at Jadavpur University. He is also a Rotten Tomatoes-certified film critic, contributing to The Fault in Our Stars, a monthly column that analyzes how artistic works can achieve greater impact. When not writing, he enjoys reading literary classics such as Aparajito, Ponyo, and The Double Life of Veronique. His preferred works span from The Corrections to The God of Small Things and A Room of One’s Own.