‘Conspired to kill me, got my brother murdered’: Roshan Anand levels explosive charges against ‘Khan Sir’
Roshan Anand Claims Faisal Khan Tried to Kill Him and Brother
Conspired to kill me got my brother – Roshan Anand, director of Gyan Bindu GS Academy, has leveled serious accusations against educator Faisal Khan, asserting that he was conspired to kill me got my brother murdered during his imprisonment. The allegations, shared with Prabhat Khabar, allege that Khan and his associates orchestrated a plot to eliminate Anand and also planned the murder of his brother, Prince Yadav, in Nepal. Anand was recently released on bail following the charges, which he claims were politically motivated and designed to frame him for crimes he did not commit.
According to Anand, the conspiracy began while he was incarcerated at a Patna jail, where he was threatened by two guards reportedly linked to Khan. These guards allegedly attempted to coerce him into confessing to the murder of his brother, which Anand insists was a premeditated act carried out by Khan’s network. He stated that police intervention prevented the plot from succeeding, highlighting the urgent need for a thorough investigation into the events that unfolded within the prison.
“The guards of Faisal Khan were trying to conspired to kill me got my brother murdered, and they even threatened to harm me if I didn’t cooperate,” Anand recounted. “I felt my life was in danger and immediately reported the incident to the authorities.”
Legal Proceedings and Allegations
Advocate Ramakant Sharma, representing Anand, noted that the court’s decision to release him on bail was based on the lack of concrete evidence linking him to the crime scene. The legal team argued that the prosecution’s case relied heavily on the charge of collusion, with no direct proof of Anand’s involvement in the murder of his brother. Sharma emphasized that the court was concerned about maintaining fair competition and ensuring that educators like Khan upheld professional standards without undue influence.
Prince Yadav, who was 24 years old and from Saharsa, Bihar, died under mysterious circumstances while staying at Subha Hotel in Biratnagar, Nepal. Morang Superintendent of Police Kabit Katuwal confirmed that Yadav had been hospitalized around 10:30 pm on Saturday after suddenly falling ill. The police are currently investigating the cause of death, with Anand demanding a post-mortem examination in Bihar and a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to uncover the truth. He believes the charges against him were fabricated to divert attention from Khan’s alleged role in the incident.
Context of the Conflict
The tensions between Anand and Khan reportedly escalated after a violent clash outside Khan’s coaching center in Patna’s Kadamkuan area on June 2. Anand and his supporters were accused of instigating the violence, which led to the arrest of three individuals, including him. However, he claims the attack was a setup to justify his imprisonment and the subsequent charges of conspiracy. The incident has sparked debates about the role of political motives in legal cases involving educators and their impact on public perception.
Section 109 of the Bihar National Security Act (BNS), which deals with attempted murder, was cited in the case against Anand. His lawyer, Niranjan Kumar Singh, stated that this section was misused because the case failed to meet the legal criteria of intent, awareness, and the accused’s presence at the crime scene. The accusation of “cooked up” charges has intensified the scrutiny on the judicial process, with Anand and his supporters arguing that the case was a deliberate attempt to tarnish his reputation and frame him for the murder of his brother.
As the investigation continues, Anand has expressed confidence in the state government’s “double engine” approach, believing it will lead to justice for both him and his brother. The case has drawn attention to the complexities of legal collusion and the importance of transparency in high-profile trials. With the public and media closely following the developments, the outcome of this case could set a precedent for similar allegations in the future.
Meanwhile, the police are working to piece together the timeline of events leading to Prince Yadav’s death. Authorities have stated that they are collaborating with forensic experts to conduct a second post-mortem examination, which Anand hopes will clarify the circumstances of his brother’s murder. The case also highlights the need for stronger safeguards against biased legal proceedings, particularly in cases involving influential figures in the education sector.