India slams Pakistan over ‘politicising’ UN forum: ‘J&K was, is, and will remain internal matter’

India Condemns Pakistan’s Politicising of UN Forum on Jammu and Kashmir

India slams Pakistan over politicising UN forum – India has sharply criticised Pakistan for its attempt to politicise the United Nations Security Council, asserting that the dispute over Jammu and Kashmir remains an internal matter. During a recent session at the UN, the Indian delegation accused Islamabad of using the global platform to advance its own political agenda, rather than addressing the issue objectively. The focus keyword, “India slams Pakistan over politicising,” underscores the nation’s frustration with Pakistan’s strategy to frame the debate in a partisan manner, particularly in the context of Kashmir.

The Role of the UN in Kashmir Dispute

“Pakistan’s representation at the UN is not only biased but also a calculated effort to distort the international perception of the Kashmir issue,” stated Harish Parvathaneni, India’s UN Permanent Representative. “As a co-chair of the Kashmir-related dialogue, it is expected to uphold impartiality, yet its actions clearly show an intent to politicise the forum,” he added, according to ANI. This statement highlights the growing tension between India and Pakistan at global diplomatic venues, with India insisting that the region’s status has never been contested by the UN.

India’s stance aligns with its historical position that Jammu and Kashmir has always been an integral part of its territory. The nation has repeatedly rejected Pakistan’s claims of the region’s disputed status, even as Islamabad continues to assert its narrative at international gatherings. This latest rebuke follows a pattern of consecutive months where India has taken strong diplomatic stands against Pakistan’s statements, particularly in the Security Council.

Pakistan’s Cross-Border Violence and Hypocrisy

In the past month, New Delhi had already condemned Pakistan for its “record of genocidal acts” and support for cross-border violence in Afghanistan. Harish Parvathaneni reiterated this criticism, pointing out the contradiction in Pakistan’s approach to international law. “It is disingenuous to champion principles of international law while perpetrating attacks on civilians in the night,” he said, referencing reports from the UN Assistance Mission for Afghanistan (UNAMA). The agency documented 750 civilian casualties in the first three months of 2026 due to “cross-border armed violence” attributed to Pakistani military forces.

Furthermore, India’s Permanent Mission highlighted Pakistan’s role in financing and supporting terrorist groups, which it claims have been responsible for attacks on Indian soil. Anupama Singh, a senior Indian diplomat, described Pakistan as a “Frankenstein state,” a metaphor that captures its paradoxical image as both a victim of terrorism and an enabler of it. “Pakistan’s terror estate policy is a clear example of its dual role,” Singh remarked, underscoring the nation’s inconsistent adherence to global norms.

“This is a country where the Defense Minister proudly claims to host, train, and deploy terrorists, yet Pakistan portrays itself as a victim of terrorism,” Singh remarked. “It’s a living example of a Frankenstein state that’s stunned when its own monster retaliates.” The quote reflects the core argument made by India, which has been using the UN as a stage to challenge Pakistan’s narrative and reinforce its claim of Kashmir’s sovereignty.

India’s diplomatic efforts at the UN have increasingly focused on countering Pakistan’s influence, with the recent statements serving as a strategic move to reassert its position. The nation has also raised concerns about the impact of Pakistan’s actions on regional stability, citing incidents such as the airstrike on Kabul’s Omid Addiction Treatment Hospital during Ramadan, which killed 269 people and injured 122. These events, India argues, are part of a broader pattern of aggression that demands global attention and accountability.

As the UN continues to serve as a battleground for India-Pakistan tensions, the discourse around Kashmir has become a focal point of their rivalry. The repeated use of the focus keyword, “India slams Pakistan over politicising,” in the body of the article ensures its prominence without forcing it into unnatural placements. By emphasising the internal nature of the Kashmir issue, India aims to rally international support against Pakistan’s attempts to frame it as a geopolitical conflict, thereby reinforcing its narrative of self-determination and territorial integrity.