‘Is something already being planned’: CJP’s Dipke flags Maharashtra Police notices ahead of protest
CJP alleges police pressure ahead of October 10 Jantar Mantar protest
Bharatmorningnews.com – Cockroach Janta Party founder Abhijeet Dipke has alleged that Maharashtra Police personnel are trying to discourage party workers from travelling to New Delhi for a protest planned at Jantar Mantar on October 10.
The proposed demonstration is intended to press for the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. The party has linked its demand to alleged irregularities in the Special Intensive Revision exercise and allegations of “vote chori”, or vote theft, raised by Opposition parties.
Speaking in Chhatrapati Sambhaji Nagar on Tuesday, Dipke said workers in Chandrapur district had received police notices and were questioned about how they would finance their journey to the capital. He described the development as deeply disappointing, particularly because he had previously praised Maharashtra Police.
“I have said multiple times that the Maharashtra Police is the best police force in the country and that the Delhi Police should learn from them. But it is heartbreaking that the Chandrapur police served notices to CJP workers, asking them not to participate in the protest at Jantar Mantar.”
Dipke said the notices also sought information about the source of money being used by workers to travel from Maharashtra to New Delhi. He released copies of two notices that he said were issued by Chandrapur police to CJP members from the district.
Notice refers to possible preventive action
One notice, addressed to Mayur Malkhede by Ballarpur police, cautioned him over his proposed participation in the New Delhi protest. It referred to permission, the possibility of violent participants being taken to the gathering, and the use of social media or speeches that could be seen as provocative.
“You should participate in the New Delhi protest without permission. Do not take along violent protestors for the protest, and do not make violent posts on social media platforms or make provocative speeches… Upon violating the formal notice you will have to face preventive or criminal action.”
The wording cited by Dipke has become central to his criticism. He questioned why the notice appeared to anticipate violence at an event that had not yet taken place, and asked whether the police had information about developments that had not been disclosed publicly.
“In the notice, the police stated that the agitation is going to be violent. How do the police know in advance that the agitation would be violent? Have they planned anything in advance?”
Preventive notices are generally used by police to warn individuals against conduct that could lead to a breach of peace or other offences. In this case, Dipke argued that the notices went beyond maintaining public order and were being used to deter political participation.
Dipke targets state government
The CJP leader called the action a form of “dictatorship” and accused Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis of potentially using the police for political purposes. He asked why officers in Maharashtra should concern themselves with a person travelling from Chandrapur to attend a protest in Delhi.
“Why is the Maharashtra Police behaving like the Delhi Police? What do they have to do if a person is going to Delhi from Chandrapur?”
Dipke also directed criticism at Fadnavis over what he described as an attempt to follow the political approach of Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath. He invoked Maharashtra’s political legacy while arguing that police resources should not be used to pressure his party’s workers.
“Why is Devendra Fadnavis trying to be UP CM Yogi Adityanath 2.0? He should know about the legacy of Maharashtra. He should not disrespect and misuse the Maharashtra Police for political ambitions.”
He said that, if authorities wished to take action, they should proceed against him rather than question workers planning to attend the protest. Dipke added that he was prepared to face arrest or prosecution under laws including the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and the National Security Act, but insisted that party members should not be harassed.
“Instead of harassing our workers, they should arrest me. If they want, they should put me behind bars and charge me under UAPA or NSA. They should not harass our workers.”
The dispute highlights the tension that can arise before large political gatherings, particularly when participants are travelling across state borders. Organisers often view advance police intervention as an obstacle to lawful protest, while police may cite their responsibility to prevent disorder and address security concerns.
For CJP, the October 10 mobilisation will be a test of whether workers from Maharashtra can reach Jantar Mantar despite the notices highlighted by Dipke. The party’s focus remains its demand for accountability over the Special Intensive Revision exercise and the broader allegations surrounding electoral integrity.
The episode has also put renewed attention on the balance between preventive policing and the right of political workers to assemble and express dissent. Dipke’s remarks make clear that the party intends to challenge any suggestion that its planned protest should be treated as inherently violent or unlawful.
Related Reading
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Is something already being planned?Is something already being planned is the main topic of this guide. The article explains the context, practical details, and next steps readers should understand.
Why does Is something already being planned matter?Is something already being planned matters because readers are looking for a useful answer, not just a short summary. Good content should match search intent and help them decide what to do next.