‘Beijjati hui wo alag’: CJP mocks Bar Council chairman over NALSAR U-turn within hours
BCI Reverses NALSAR Enrollment Freeze After CJP Pressure
Rapid Policy Shift
Bharatmorningnews.com – The Bar Council of India made a swift reversal on Thursday evening, rescinding its directive that had halted enrollment for the complete 2026 graduating class at NALSAR University of Law in Hyderabad. This decision came mere hours after the Cockroach Janta Party issued warnings of widespread demonstrations.
The CJP, known for orchestrating a massive youth rally at Delhi's Jantar Mantar regarding examination malpractices, successfully pushed for the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan during that earlier campaign.
Initially, the BCI instructed every state bar council to suspend student registrations while gathering information about individuals reportedly leading opposition against Chief Justice of India Surya Kant attending the university's convocation ceremony.
Timeline of Events
Abhijeet Dipke, who established the CJP, took to social media platform X near 7:25 PM to signal potential renewed agitation. His message read:
"What if all legal cockroaches come together?"
Within approximately ninety minutes, BCI Chairman Manan Kumar Mishra announced the modified stance. Posting on X around 8:45 PM, he clarified:
"After detailed deliberation, the @barcouncilindia has modified its earlier directions concerning @NALSAR_Official. All 2026 passed-out students of NALSAR will now be entitled to seek enrolment with the State Bar Council of their choice. The factual inquiry will continue, and further action will follow on the basis of the report. No student shall be made to suffer without any fault on his or her part."
The entire sequence—from initial directive to complete withdrawal—transpired within a two-hour window.
After-Midnight Clarification
Following midnight, Mishra released another statement explaining that the Council had carefully reviewed inputs from senior advocates, practicing bar members, law students, and concerned citizens. He concluded that the NALSAR cohort "had no role in any disturbance or movement."
His complete message stated:
"After considering the representations and reactions of Senior Advocates, learned members of the Bar, law students and public spirited citizens, and being satisfied that the 2026 batch of NALSAR, Hyderabad, had no role in any disturbance or movement, the Bar Council of India has decided to close the proceedings altogether. No further action is required."
Mishra extended good wishes to students while emphasizing they should express views "with respect and institutional decorum." He additionally noted that "Dissent is welcome in a democracy; public ridicule of constitutional institutions is often counterproductive."
CJP Response and Continued Demands
The CJP ridiculed the BCI leadership for what they viewed as a hasty reversal. Spokesperson Ashutosh Ranka commented on Mishra's announcement:
"CJP ne night out padwa diya. Beijjati hui wo alag."
However, another CJP representative, Saurav Das, contested the completeness of the withdrawal. He pointed out that certain elements remained unchanged:
"Mr. Mishra, the order has NOT been fully withdrawn. The part which seeks names of the students and orders for an 'inquiry' against them for their peaceful dissent still stands, as per your own new letter."
Das called for complete withdrawal of the communication and assurance that NALSAR students would face no consequences for their democratic expression regarding the Chief Justice of India. He confirmed that CJP demonstrations outside both the BCI headquarters and Mishra's official residence would persist until these conditions were satisfied.
Reconciliation Efforts
On Friday, Mishra reached out directly to CJP leaders Dipke and Das, emphasizing shared objectives. Speaking with ANI news agency, he explained:
"The Bar Council of India aims to protect the interests of the youth of India. I want to communicate to Abhijeet Dipke and Das (Sourav Das) that our interests are the same as theirs, to protect the rights of the students."
Background Context
Earlier reporting by HT revealed that the BCI's original directive requested an authenticated document identifying those who initiated, organized, coordinated, or mobilized the campaign opposing the CJI's convocation participation. The communication also required comprehensive details including representations, signatories, meetings held, social-media group activities, and involvement of faculty members, alumni associations, student organizations, or external parties.
Related Reading
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Beijjati hui wo alag?Beijjati hui wo alag is the main topic of this guide. The article explains the context, practical details, and next steps readers should understand.
Why does Beijjati hui wo alag matter?Beijjati hui wo alag matters because readers are looking for a useful answer, not just a short summary. Good content should match search intent and help them decide what to do next.