BharatMorningNews
Fast mobile article powered by Nexiamath-SEO AMP.
AMP Article

Abhishek Banerjee faces third complaint over Sebaashray health camps

Published जुलाई 6, 2026 · Updated जुलाई 6, 2026 · By Jessica Anderson

Abhishek Banerjee Faces Third Complaint Over Sebaashray Health Camps

Pending Legal Actions Highlight Concerns About Program's Operations

Abhishek Banerjee faces third complaint over - Abhishek Banerjee faces a third complaint in a growing legal controversy surrounding the Sebaashray health camps, which have been a focal point of public and political debate since their inception in 2025. The latest allegations, filed by BJP representative Abhijit Das, accuse the TMC’s national general secretary of procedural mismanagement and clinical oversight in the implementation of the initiative. This marks the second time Das has raised concerns against Banerjee and his associates, adding to the existing legal scrutiny that has been building since the program’s launch. The complaint specifically highlights irregularities in the use of medical equipment and the involvement of non-qualified personnel, raising questions about the transparency and effectiveness of the health camps.

“Medical students from government colleges were deployed at the camps and misrepresented as qualified physicians. Additionally, X-Ray and ECG equipment was used without adhering to national regulations,” Das stated. He submitted the report at Bishnupur police station, which is located in South 24 Parganas district where Banerjee serves as a Lok Sabha member. The filing comes as part of a broader pattern of criticism, with Das and others alleging that the program’s operations have been inconsistent with established healthcare standards.

The complaints suggest that the Sebaashray initiative, aimed at providing accessible and affordable healthcare to underserved communities, has faced challenges in maintaining its credibility and impact.

Das previously filed a complaint on July 1 at Diamond Harbour police station, prompting the filing of an FIR under sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), the National Medical Commission Act, and the West Bengal Clinical Establishments Act. This second FIR, lodged on July 3, followed a similar claim by Sukdeb Das, a local citizen. The escalating legal actions underscore the concerns of both political opponents and concerned residents, who argue that the program’s operations have not met the required benchmarks for quality and accountability.

Allegations Include Prenatal Sex Determination Violations

The complaint further claims that ultrasound machines were misused for gender identification in pregnancies, breaching the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (PC & PNDT) Act of 1994. This allegation has intensified scrutiny of the health camps, as it ties into broader debates about the ethical use of medical technology in public health programs. Das named Banerjee’s associates Sumit Roy and Ayan Ghosh Dastidar, as well as TMC leaders Jahangir Khan and Saokat Molla, who have been implicated in separate legal cases since the BJP assumed power. The inclusion of these individuals in the complaint highlights the political dimension of the dispute and suggests a coordinated effort to challenge the program’s legitimacy.

Abhishek Banerjee faces a third complaint over Sebaashray health camps, which have been criticized for their alleged mismanagement of medical resources. The focus of the current complaint centers on the deployment of students and the use of equipment without proper oversight. While the program has been praised for its reach, with reports indicating that over 12.3 lakh individuals have benefited from free consultations, diagnostic assessments, and essential medications, these allegations have sparked a debate about the balance between accessibility and quality. Critics argue that such practices may undermine the trust of the public in the initiative’s effectiveness.

Government Responses and Investigative Steps

Bengal’s health minister, Dr. Sharadwat Mukherjee, an oncologist, confirmed that his department is reviewing reports related to the health camps. “We have collected all necessary documentation to conduct a detailed inquiry,” he said, emphasizing the government’s commitment to addressing the concerns raised. However, the minister’s response has not fully resolved the controversy, as some officials remain skeptical about the depth of the investigation. Meanwhile, the TMC has defended the program, citing its transformative impact on communities, particularly in remote areas where healthcare access is limited.

“Residents from remote regions participated in the program, showcasing its reach and significance in delivering affordable healthcare,” the TMC’s official website emphasized. “Launched by Shri Abhishek Banerjee on January 2, 2025, Sebaashray has provided free consultations, diagnostic assessments, and essential medications to over 12.3 lakh individuals.”

Despite this, the TMC MLA Kunal Ghosh, who supports Mamata Banerjee, distanced himself from the controversy, stating, “I cannot comment on the matter as the camps were not organized by the party. I remain unaware of the specifics.” His statement, however, did not quell the growing public discourse, with many questioning the leadership’s involvement in the program’s oversight.

Political Implications and Public Perception

Abhishek Banerjee faces a third complaint over Sebaashray health camps, which has drawn attention to the challenges of maintaining accountability in large-scale public initiatives. The BJP’s criticism of the program comes amid a political climate where healthcare policies are often scrutinized for their alignment with party agendas. For instance, the focus on prenatal sex determination violations ties into broader political narratives about the role of state governments in regulating medical practices. While the TMC maintains that the health camps have delivered critical services to marginalized populations, the complaints suggest that there are ongoing efforts to highlight discrepancies in their implementation.

Public perception of the Sebaashray program remains divided. On one hand, many residents in participating areas have reported positive experiences, citing the availability of free medical services and the reduction in healthcare costs. On the other hand, critics argue that the program’s success has been overshadowed by allegations of procedural negligence and lack of oversight. The third complaint against Abhishek Banerjee, therefore, not only reflects concerns about the program’s management but also underscores the political tensions surrounding its rollout. As the legal investigations continue, the fate of the Sebaashray initiative will likely depend on the findings and the transparency of the process.

Context and Broader Impact on Healthcare Initiatives

Abhishek Banerjee faces a third complaint over Sebaashray health camps, which have become a symbol of the government’s efforts to expand healthcare access. The program, launched in 2025, was designed to address the gap in medical services for low-income families and remote communities. However, the complaints have brought to light issues such as the lack of proper qualifications for personnel involved and the inconsistent use of diagnostic equipment. These allegations could have far-reaching implications for future healthcare initiatives, as they may influence public trust and funding priorities.

The controversy surrounding the Sebaashray health camps has also sparked a discussion about the role of political parties in overseeing public welfare programs. With the BJP and TMC at odds over the program’s management, the complaints may serve as a catalyst for reform. The growing number of legal actions against Banerjee highlights the need for stricter adherence to regulatory frameworks and a more transparent approach to program execution. As the investigation progresses, it will be crucial to assess whether these complaints are isolated incidents or part of a larger pattern of mismanagement that could affect the credibility of the TMC’s healthcare policies.