BharatMorningNews
Fast mobile article powered by Nexiamath-SEO AMP.
AMP Article

‘75% earnings go to CM’: Marandi alleges top-level patronage after 4 die in illegal mine tragedy, Cong hits back

Published जून 15, 2026 · Updated जून 15, 2026 · By John Johnson

75% Earnings Go to CM: BJP Leader Accuses State Government of Corruption in Illegal Mine Tragedy

75 earnings go to CM - Following the tragic collapse of an illegal coal mine in Ramgarh district on Saturday that claimed the lives of four laborers, BJP leader Babulal Marandi accused the state government of profiting from the disaster. The leader of the opposition raised concerns about the distribution of mine earnings, alleging that 75% of the profits go directly to the Chief Minister’s office, while the remaining 25% is shared among local brokers and officials. His criticism comes amid growing public outrage over the lack of safety measures and the apparent complicity of authorities in the incident.

The Tragedy at Argadda Pit

Devastation struck the Ramgarh district when a section of the Argadda coal pit collapsed, trapping one worker and suffocating four others. Deva Bedia, Dablu Bedia, Kishor Ravani, and Ashish Ghatwar were among the victims, highlighting the urgent need for improved safety standards in the region’s booming illegal mining operations. Marandi visited the site to witness the aftermath firsthand, drawing attention to the systemic failures that led to the disaster and questioning the administration’s commitment to worker welfare.

“This was not an accident—it was a calculated act of negligence. The 75% earnings go to CM, but the workers are left to face the consequences of this corrupt system,” Marandi stated, emphasizing the need for accountability. He argued that the state’s failure to enforce safety protocols had turned the mine into a death trap for laborers.

Systemic Corruption and Political Accountability

Marandi accused the state’s top authorities of orchestrating the illegal mining activities, with the forest department playing a key role in enabling the operations. He pointed to the payment of ₹5,000 to families for basic rescue efforts as evidence of a corrupt structure where public safety is secondary to personal gain. The leader of the opposition also criticized the appointments of administrative and police personnel, suggesting that they are chosen through backdoor deals rather than merit-based selection.

“The 75% earnings go to CM, and the rest is distributed to those who ensure the mines remain unchecked. This tragedy is a result of a system that prioritizes profit over people,” he said, calling for an independent inquiry into the incident. Marandi’s allegations underscore the deepening scrutiny on the state government’s role in the coal mining sector.

According to the opposition, over 100 clandestine coal pits operate in the Ramgarh area, many of which lack proper ventilation and safety measures. Families of the victims have demanded ₹10 lakh in compensation from Central Coalfields Limited (CCL), urging immediate action for a judicial probe. Marandi likened the officials involved to homicide perpetrators, arguing that their salaries should be tied to safeguarding workers rather than exploiting them.

Congress's Defense and Political Tactics

Congress state spokesperson Sonal Shanti countered the BJP’s claims, asserting that central agencies, not the state government, are responsible for securing abandoned mines. “The 75% earnings go to CM, but the duty of closing these pits lies with organizations like CCL and BCCL,” she said, accusing the BJP of politicizing the tragedy for electoral gain. Shanti also noted that Marandi’s sudden focus on corruption emerged only after he joined the BJP, suggesting his previous stance on governance was less critical.

“Marandi’s allegations are a strategic move to shift blame from central entities. The 75% earnings go to CM, but the state has done its part to regulate the industry,” Shanti argued, defending the administration’s actions. She called for a fair investigation into the incident, emphasizing the need to distinguish between systemic issues and political manipulation.

As the investigation continues, the incident has reignited debates about the role of local authorities in ensuring mining safety. The victims’ families are now demanding transparency in the financial dealings of the mine operators, with the 75% earnings go to CM figure becoming a central point of contention. Critics argue that the state’s regulatory framework is weak, allowing illegal mining to flourish with little oversight. Meanwhile, the Congress party maintains that the tragedy is a consequence of the mining industry’s broader challenges rather than a deliberate act of corruption.

With the political battle intensifying, the 75% earnings go to CM claim has taken on greater significance. It not only underscores the financial incentives for officials to overlook safety standards but also highlights the disparity between the state’s profiteering and the workers’ peril. As the families of the victims push for justice, the incident serves as a stark reminder of the human cost of unchecked industrial expansion and the urgent need for reforms to prevent future tragedies.